Unit of competency Outline

Date retreived
23/07/2026 6:19 PM AWST

Whilst all efforts are made to provide accurate and timely information from the relevant source/documentation, please be aware that the information supplied may not be the most current version. The accuracy of the detail has not been confirmed by the Department and therefore should not be relied upon without first confirming the contents.

Monitor and review biosecurity measures

Monitor and review biosecurity measures

Unit of competency
National Code
AHCBIO305A
State Code
D6698
TGA Status
Deleted
DTWD Status
Deleted
Current Release Number
1.00
Current Release Date
10/06/2011
View on TGA
State Implementation and Classification
Approved Date
15/02/2012
Field of Education
059901 - Pest And Weed Control
Original Release Date
15/02/2012
Nominal Hours
80
Description
This unit covers monitoring and reviewing biosecurity measures defines the standard required to: interpret quarantine procedures and monitor compliance; supervise the range of activities required to maintain biosecurity; communicate with staff and visitors on biosecurity issues and procedures; respond to breaches of biosecurity and participate in the review of biosecurity measures.
Notes
Elements and Performance Criteria
1. Apply biosecurity procedures to people, animals and equipment entering the site
  • 1.1. Possible sources of pathogen contamination entering the site are identified.
  • 1.2. Personal sanitation and hygiene is maintained including required change of clothing and showering if required on entry to quarantined area.
  • 1.3. Sign in procedures are completed with information supplied fully and accurately.
  • 1.4. Visitors are signed in, checked for risk profile and instructed in quarantine requirements.
  • 1.5. All equipment is cleaned and disinfected before being brought onto the site.
  • 1.6. Animals introduced to the site are checked for health status, isolated from all others and placed in disinfected sheds.
2. Implement biosecurity procedures to prevent the incidence or spread of pathogens
  • 2.1. Potential biosecurity threats on the enterprise are identified.
  • 2.2. The potential costs and impacts of an outbreak of disease in a production facility are quantified and described.
  • 2.3. Possible sources of pathogen contamination being carried between sheds are identified.
  • 2.4. Procedures for entering sheds or moving from one shed to another are implemented.
  • 2.5. Order of priority and prescribed routes are established for movements, with younger or more susceptible animals visited before more resistant animals.
  • 2.6. Personal sanitation and equipment cleaning procedures are implemented for movement between sheds.
  • 2.7. Farm compound footpaths and areas around sheds are kept clear of debris.
3. Apply on-farm sanitation practices to reduce the risk of disease
  • 3.1. Litter is cleaned from sheds and dust removed from surfaces.
  • 3.2. Shed areas are sprayed down with water and then allowed to dry before disinfection.
  • 3.3. Shed feeding and watering equipment is pressure cleaned and water lines flushed.
  • 3.4. Disinfectant is mixed and applied according to label requirements and enterprise procedures.
4. Implement pest control to reduce the risk of disease
  • 4.1. High risk pathogens that can be introduced by pests are identified.
  • 4.2. Pests are excluded from the facility, and from individual sheds, by effective physical barriers.
  • 4.3. Pest numbers are monitored through the use of counts or other indicators.
  • 4.4. Pest control procedures are carried out including destruction of habitat and poisoning.
  • 4.5. Feeds imported are screened for introduction of pests.
5. Review biosecurity procedures
  • 5.1. Records of biosecurity procedures are kept as required by standards and protocols.
  • 5.2. Effectiveness and progress of control activities are monitored and compared with planned objectives.
  • 5.3. Monitoring of sheds and facilities is carried out as part of work duties to ensure that work practices and procedures are applied in line with required standards and protocols.
  • 5.4. Issues and concerns with biosecurity are reported to management.
  • 5.5. Control activities are revised as required to address relevant protocols, maintain cost-effectiveness (including appropriate resource allocation) and contain wider impacts.
  • 5.6. Revisions to activities are communicated promptly to other staff.
RANGE STATEMENT
The range statement relates to the unit of competency as a whole.
Animals may include:
pigs
poultry.
Biosecurity may include:
isolation or quarantine through physical barriers as well as hygiene practices to prevent importing pathogens onto the site, or from spreading if they are able to enter the site.
EVIDENCE GUIDE
The evidence guide provides advice on assessment and must be read in conjunction with the performance criteria, required skills and knowledge, range statement and the Assessment Guidelines for the Training Package.
Overview of assessment

Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit
The evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit must be relevant to workplace operations and satisfy holistically all of the requirements of the performance criteria and required skills and knowledge and include achievement of the following:
interpret quarantine procedures and monitor compliance
supervise the range of activities required to maintain biosecurity
communicate with staff and visitors on biosecurity issues and procedures
respond to breaches of biosecurity
participate in the review of biosecurity measures.
Context of and specific resources for assessment
Competency requires the application of work practices under work conditions. Selection and use of resources for some worksites may differ due to the regional or enterprise circumstances.
Method of assessment
This unit may be assessed in a holistic way with other units. The assessment strategy for this unit must verify required knowledge, skill and application using more than one of the following assessment methods: oral/written questions, professional conversations, direct observation, third-party evidence, performance audit and portfolio.
Guidance information for assessment
Evidence should be gathered over a period of time in a range of actual or simulated environments.
No information