Unit of competency Outline
Date retreived
23/07/2026 7:44 PM AWST
23/07/2026 7:44 PM AWST
Whilst all efforts are made to provide accurate and timely information from the relevant source/documentation, please be aware that the information supplied may not be the most current version. The accuracy of the detail has not been confirmed by the Department and therefore should not be relied upon without first confirming the contents.
Mistake proof a production process
Mistake proof a production process
Unit of competency
National Code
ICPSU486B
ICPSU486B
State Code
D0531
D0531
TGA Status
Replaced
Replaced
DTWD Status
Replaced
Replaced
State Implementation and Classification
Approved Date
30/11/2007
Field of Education
080317 - Quality Management
Original Release Date
30/11/2007
Nominal Hours
60
Description
Notes
Elements and Performance Criteria
No information
The range statement relates to the unit of competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording, if used in the performance criteria, is detailed below. Essential operating conditions that may be present with training and assessment (depending on the work situation, needs of the candidate, accessibility of the item, and local industry and regional contexts) may also be included.
Mistake proofing
Sometimes known as baka-yoke / poka-yoke - a manufacturing technique of preventing mistakes by designing the manufacturing process, equipment, tools and components / subassemblies so that an operation literally cannot be performed incorrectly; an attempt to perform incorrectly, as well as being prevented, is usually met with a warning signal of some sort
Procedures
Procedures includes all work instructions, standard operating procedures, formulas / recipes, batch sheets, temporary instructions and similar instructions provided for the smooth running of the plant. They may be written, oral, computer-based or in some other form
For the purposes of this Training Package, procedures also includes good operating practice as may be defined by industry codes of practice (eg Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP), Responsible Care) and government regulations
Mistake proofing
Sometimes known as baka-yoke / poka-yoke - a manufacturing technique of preventing mistakes by designing the manufacturing process, equipment, tools and components / subassemblies so that an operation literally cannot be performed incorrectly; an attempt to perform incorrectly, as well as being prevented, is usually met with a warning signal of some sort
Procedures
Procedures includes all work instructions, standard operating procedures, formulas / recipes, batch sheets, temporary instructions and similar instructions provided for the smooth running of the plant. They may be written, oral, computer-based or in some other form
For the purposes of this Training Package, procedures also includes good operating practice as may be defined by industry codes of practice (eg Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP), Responsible Care) and government regulations
The evidence guide provides advice on assessment and must be read in conjunction with the performance criteria, required skills and knowledge, range statement and the Assessment Guidelines for the Training Package.
Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency
Evidence of the following is essential:
The competent team leader will be able to analyse their process and implement systems to ensure the process is mistake proof and the operators work in a predictable way with little or no chance of mistake. Evidence of actions taken to mistake proof the process should be available
One complex project on standardisation of a process or several simpler projects will be needed to gain sufficient evidence
Context of and specific resources for assessment
Assessment must ensure:
assessment needs to occur in a workplace implementing competitive manufacturing or by using a suitable project
access to an organisation using a competitive manufacturing approach
Method of assessment
A range of assessment methods should be used to assess practical skills and knowledge. The following examples are appropriate for this unit:
direct questioning combined with review of portfolios of evidence and third party workplace reports of on-the-job performance by the candidate.
Holistic assessment with other units relevant to the industry sector, workplace and job role is recommended, for example:
ICPSU684B Determine and improve process capability
Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency
Evidence of the following is essential:
The competent team leader will be able to analyse their process and implement systems to ensure the process is mistake proof and the operators work in a predictable way with little or no chance of mistake. Evidence of actions taken to mistake proof the process should be available
One complex project on standardisation of a process or several simpler projects will be needed to gain sufficient evidence
Context of and specific resources for assessment
Assessment must ensure:
assessment needs to occur in a workplace implementing competitive manufacturing or by using a suitable project
access to an organisation using a competitive manufacturing approach
Method of assessment
A range of assessment methods should be used to assess practical skills and knowledge. The following examples are appropriate for this unit:
direct questioning combined with review of portfolios of evidence and third party workplace reports of on-the-job performance by the candidate.
Holistic assessment with other units relevant to the industry sector, workplace and job role is recommended, for example:
ICPSU684B Determine and improve process capability
Replaces
| State Code | National Code | Title | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| C8631 | ICPSU486A | Mistake proof a production process | Unit of competency |
Replaced By
| State Code | National Code | Title | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| D3281 | ICPSU486C | Mistake proof a production process | Unit of competency |