Unit of competency Outline

Date retreived
23/07/2026 1:05 PM AWST

Whilst all efforts are made to provide accurate and timely information from the relevant source/documentation, please be aware that the information supplied may not be the most current version. The accuracy of the detail has not been confirmed by the Department and therefore should not be relied upon without first confirming the contents.

Generate complex imposition

Generate complex imposition

Unit of competency
National Code
ICPPP435C
State Code
D3149
TGA Status
Replaced
DTWD Status
Replaced
Current Release Number
1.00
Current Release Date
05/07/2010
State Implementation and Classification
Approved Date
10/09/2014
Field of Education
030103 - Printing
Original Release Date
10/09/2014
Nominal Hours
50
Description
This unit describes the performance outcomes, skills and knowledge required to undertake complex electronic imposition
Notes
Elements and Performance Criteria
1. Impose images electronically
  • 1.1. Industry designated software is applied to the imposition of images according to job specifications
  • 1.2. Imposition options are reviewed to ensure best fit for final substrate size
  • 1.3. Trapping variables are taken into account
  • 1.4. The particularities of the press are considered
2. Solve technical problems of imposition
  • 2.1. Technical problems relevant to imposition are considered in the imposition scheme
  • 2.2. A lay-down sheet is prepared according to cutting and creasing and folding requirements
  • 2.3. Binding and finishing requirements are considered according to job specifications
RANGE STATEMENT
The range statement relates to the unit of competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording, if used in the performance criteria, is detailed below. Essential operating conditions that may be present with training and assessment (depending on the work situation, needs of the candidate, accessibility of the item, and local industry and regional contexts) may also be included.
Imposition software may include:
may include Imposition Publisher, Preps, DynaStrip, Impose-X, FACILIS IM, Panther PageImposer. New software applications and new versions of existing products enter the market regularly and therefore this example group will change
imposition plug-ins (eg Quark Express, Impolite) and imposition components of page layout applications where imposition is completely automated are not appropriate for assessing this unit of competency.
Input may include:
complex imposition data.
Capture may include:
any desktop or proprietary computing system.
Manipulation/edit may include:
a suitable imposition application.
Output may include:
printers, hard disk, imagesetters, digital proofers or plotters.
Complexity may include:
complex refers to intricate and detailed imposition and may include difficult cuts for packaging, design variations, folds and bindings.
Quality standards may include:
should meet client requirements and enterprise and industry standards.
EVIDENCE GUIDE
The Evidence Guide provides advice on assessment and must be read in conjunction with the performance criteria, required skills and knowledge, range statement and the Assessment Guidelines for the Training Package.

Overview of assessment

Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit
Evidence of the ability to:
imposition that best meets the job specifications and substrate size
the underlying skill of solving complex technical problems of imposition to conform to brief specifications should be transferable across the design and pre-press sectors. It is important that the substrate for reproduction is identified and that the competencies be demonstrated with a clear identification of printing processes
demonstrate an ability to find and use information relevant to the task from a variety of information sources
produce TWO complex impositions according to the listed Performance Criteria.

Context of and specific resources for assessment
Assessment must ensure:
assessment may take place on the job, off the job or a combination of these. Off the job assessment must be undertaken in a closely simulated workplace environment
it is expected that special purpose tools, equipment and industry software packages will be used where appropriate.

Method of assessment
A range of assessment methods should be used to assess practical skills and knowledge. The following examples are appropriate for this unit:
direct questioning combined with review of portfolios of evidence and third party workplace reports of on-the-job performance by the candidate.

Guidance information for assessment
Holistic assessment with other units relevant to the industry sector, workplace and job role is recommended.
Replaces
State Code National Code Title Type
D0411 ICPPP435B Generate complex imposition Unit of competency
Replaced By
State Code National Code Title Type
AUO66 ICPPRP435 Generate complex imposition Unit of competency