Unit of competency Outline

Date retreived
22/07/2026 9:19 PM AWST

Whilst all efforts are made to provide accurate and timely information from the relevant source/documentation, please be aware that the information supplied may not be the most current version. The accuracy of the detail has not been confirmed by the Department and therefore should not be relied upon without first confirming the contents.

Develop interfaces for multiple access methods to monitor, schedule and control an electrical integrated system

Develop interfaces for multiple access methods to monitor, schedule and control an electrical integrated system

Unit of competency
National Code
UEENEEI144A
State Code
WC660
TGA Status
Deleted
DTWD Status
Deleted
Current Release Number
2.00
Current Release Date
06/03/2013
State Implementation and Classification
Approved Date
28/07/2014
Field of Education
031307 - Communications Technologies
Original Release Date
28/07/2014
Nominal Hours
18
Description
1)Scope:1.1) DescriptorThis unit covers programming for multiple access to integrated systems for a single dwelling. Such access includes mobile phones, computer networks, remote controls, touch screens and the like. It encompasses working safely and to manufacturer’s instructions and regulatory requirements, installing and setting up gateway equipment, applying knowledge of the application of integrated system including remote reprogramming and monitoring, using proprietary programming tools, and documenting as-programmed access functions.
Notes
Elements and Performance Criteria
1 Prepare to develop an interfaces for multiple access methods of integrated system
  • 1.1 The extent of the various services in the integrated system determined from the systems data base and customer requirements.
  • 1.2 Control parameters are determined from the integrated systems data base and confirmed with the customer.
  • 1.3 Programming software tools and project data are down loaded to a compatible PC and checked
  • 1.4 Manufacturer’s instruction for installing and connecting gateway equipment are read and understood.
2 Develop an interface for multiple access of integrated systems
  • 2.1 OHS risk control work measures and procedures are followed.
  • 2.2 Knowledge of IT network accessing integrated system programming methods are used in programming multiple access control.
  • 2.3 Functions and parameters of integrated system services are programmed in accordance with manufacturer’s instruction and to customer requirements.
  • 2.4 Gateway equipment installation and connectivity is implemented in accordance with manufacturer’s instruction and regulatory requirements.
3 Back up, transfer and test system access
  • 3.1 OHS work completion risk control measures and procedures are followed.
  • 3.2 Programmed access, functions and parameters are backed up and transfer to the system following manufacturer’s instructions.
  • 3.3 Programmed access methods tests are conducted to verify compatibility and compliance with the integrated system and customer requirements.
  • 3.4 Non-compliance operations and anomalies are corrected to comply with manufacturer’s and customer requirements.
  • 3.5 A copy of the documentation of the as-programmed multiple access specifications are given the client or client’s representative.
RANGE STATEMENT
10) This relates to the unit as a whole providing the range of contexts and conditions to which the performance criteria apply. It allows for different work environments and situations that will affect performance.
This unit shall be demonstrated in relation to developing interfaces and program to monitor, schedule and control an integrated system by the following access methods
Mobile phone
Computer
Touch screen
Remote controller
Manual input devices
Generic terms used throughout this Vocational Standard shall be regarded as part of the Range Statement in which competency is demonstrated. The definition of these and other terms that apply are given in Volume 2, Part 2.1.
EVIDENCE GUIDE
9) The evidence guide provides advice on assessment and must be read in conjunction with the Performance Criteria, Required Skills and Knowledge, the Range Statement and the Assessment Guidelines for this Training Package.
The Evidence Guide forms an integral part of this unit. It must be used in conjunction with all parts of the unit and performed in accordance with the Assessment Guidelines of this Training Package.

Overview of Assessment
9.1)

Longitudinal competency development approaches to assessment, such as Profiling, require data to be reliably gathered in a form that can be consistently interpreted over time. This approach is best utilised in Apprenticeship programs and reduces assessment intervention. It is the industry-preferred model for apprenticeships. However, where summative (or final) assessment is used it is to include the application of the competency in the normal work environment or, at a minimum, the application of the competency in a realistically simulated work environment. It is recognised that, in some circumstances, assessment in part or full can occur outside the workplace. However, it must be in accordance with industry and regulatory policy.
Methods chosen for a particular assessment will be influenced by various factors. These include the extent of the assessment, the most effective locations for the assessment activities to take place, access to physical resources, additional safety measures that may be required and the critical nature of the competencies being assessed.
The critical safety nature of working with electricity, electrical equipment, gas or any other hazardous substance/material carries risk in deeming a person competent. Sources of evidence need to be ‘rich’ in nature to minimise error in judgment.
Activities associated with normal everyday work have a bearing on the decision as to how much and how detailed the data gathered will contribute to its ‘richness’. Some skills are more critical to safety and operational requirements while the same skills may be more or less frequently practised. These points are raised for the assessors to consider when choosing an assessment method and developing assessment instruments. Sample assessment instruments are included for Assessors in the Assessment Guidelines of this Training Package.

Critical aspects of evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit
9.2)

Before the critical aspects of evidence are considered all prerequisites must be met.
Evidence for competence in this unit shall be considered holistically. Each element and associated performance criteria shall be demonstrated on at least two occasions in accordance with the ‘Assessment Guidelines - UEE11. Evidence shall also comprise:
A representative body of performance criteria demonstrated within the timeframes typically expected of the discipline, work function and industrial environment. In particular this shall incorporate evidence that shows a candidate is able to:
Implement Occupational Health and Safety workplace procedures and practices, including the use of risk control measures as specified in the performance criteria and range statement
Apply sustainable energy principles and practices as specified in the performance criteria and range statement
Demonstrate an understanding of the required skills and knowledge as described in this unit. It may be required by some jurisdictions that RTOs provide a percentile graded result for the purpose of regulatory or licensing requirements.
Demonstrate an appropriate level of skills enabling employment
Conduct work observing the relevant Anti Discrimination legislation, regulations, polices and workplace procedures
Demonstrated consistent performance across a representative range of contexts from the prescribed items below:
as described in 8) and including:

A
Determining extent of the various services and functions and parameters of the integrated system

B
Down loading a PC and checking software tools and integrated system programming software and project data.

C
Checking that network equipment and connectivity comply with manufacture’s requirements.

D
Developing integrated system multiple access with manufacturer’s instruction and to customer requirements.

E
Backing up and transferring programmed assess functions and parameters following manufacturer’s instructions.

F
Testing multiple access and correcting non-compliance operations and anomalies.

G
Documenting the as-programmed access control specifications.

Context of and specific resources for assessment
9.3)

This unit should be assessed as it relates to normal work practice using procedures, information and resources typical of a workplace. This should include:
OHS policy and work procedures and instructions.
Suitable work environment, facilities, equipment and materials to undertake actual work as prescribed in this unit.
These should be used in the formal learning/assessment environment.
Note:
Where simulation is considered a suitable strategy for assessment, conditions for assessment must be authentic and as far as possible reproduce and replicate the workplace and be consistent with the approved industry simulation policy.
The resources used for assessment should reflect current industry practices in relation to developing interfaces for multiple access methods to monitor, schedule and control an integrated system.

Method of assessment
9.4)

This unit shall be assessed by methods given in Volume 1, Part 3 ‘Assessment Guidelines’.
Note:
Competent performance with inherent safe working practices is expected in the Industry to which this unit applies. This requires that the specified required skills and knowledge are assessed in a structured environment which is primarily intended for learning/assessment and incorporates all necessary equipment and facilities for learners to develop and demonstrate the required skills and knowledge described in this unit.

Concurrent assessment and relationship with other units
9.5)

There are no concurrent assessment recommendations for this unit.
No information