Unit of competency Outline

Date retreived
23/07/2026 7:47 PM AWST

Whilst all efforts are made to provide accurate and timely information from the relevant source/documentation, please be aware that the information supplied may not be the most current version. The accuracy of the detail has not been confirmed by the Department and therefore should not be relied upon without first confirming the contents.

Write programs for industrial robots

Write programs for industrial robots

Unit of competency
National Code
MEM07039A
State Code
W5381
TGA Status
Replaced
DTWD Status
Replaced
Current Release Number
1.00
Current Release Date
01/12/2005
State Implementation and Classification
Approved Date
26/10/2006
Field of Education
030717 - Plant And Machine Operations
Original Release Date
26/10/2006
Nominal Hours
36
Description
This unit covers planning and writing computer programs for robot operations.
Notes
Elements and Performance Criteria
1. Identify robot requirements
  • 1.1. Robot features and specifications are identified.
  • 1.2. Robot language is identified.
  • 1.3. Robot safety features are identified.
  • 1.4. Manufacturer's operating procedures and engineering drawings are interpreted to define robot function and tool path geometry.
  • 1.5. Required operations for robot and end effectors are determined in conjunction with appropriate technical experts or other technical reference sources.
2. Plan robot program
  • 2.1. Programming requirements are identified.
  • 2.2. Coordinates are calculated for tool path or robot functions.
  • 2.3. Programming method is selected.
  • 2.4. Program plan is developed.
3. Write basic program
  • 3.1. Robot and computer equipment is prepared.
  • 3.2. Program is written in required language and in accordance with standard operating procedures.
  • 3.3. Safety features are incorporated in robot program.
  • 3.4. Operation sheet is prepared.
4. Trial program
  • 4.1. Program is trialled by operating robot in manual mode in conjunction with operator as appropriate.
  • 4.2. Program performance is verified against required specifications and with appropriate technical experts or other technical reference sources.
  • 4.3. Program is edited if necessary to adjust operation as required.
  • 4.4. Components are checked for conformance to specifications as required.
RANGE STATEMENT
The range statement relates to the unit of competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording, if used in the performance criteria, is detailed below. Essential operating conditions that may be present with training and assessment (depending on the work situation, needs of the candidate, accessibility of the item, and local industry and regional contexts) may also be included.
Features and specifications
Components
Capabilities
Speed
Reach
Load carrying capacity
Accuracy/repeatability
Classification
Polar coordinate
Cylindrical coordinate
Cartesian coordinate
Jointed elbow
SCARA
Movements
Base
Shoulder
Elbow
Pitch
Roll
Yaw
Applications
Required operating conditions
Limitations
Justification
Safety features
Language
Language appropriate to robot type
Safety features
AS2939 - 1987 - Industrial Robot Safety - Safe Design and Usage
Physical design
Enclosures
Layout
Programming
Sensing
Personnel
Method
Manual
Walkthrough
Leadthrough
Offline
Optical/vision or sensor systems
EVIDENCE GUIDE
The evidence guide provides advice on assessment and must be read in conjunction with the performance criteria, required skills and knowledge, range statement and the Assessment Guidelines for the Training Package.
Overview of assessment
A person who demonstrates competency in this unit must be able to write basic robot programs. Competency in this unit cannot be claimed until all prerequisites have been satisfied.
Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit
Assessors must be satisfied that the candidate can competently and consistently perform all elements of the unit as specified by the criteria, including required knowledge, and be capable of applying the competency in new and different situations and contexts.
Context of and specific resources for assessment
This unit may be assessed on the job, off the job or a combination of both on and off the job. Where assessment occurs off the job, that is the candidate is not in productive work, then an appropriate simulation must be used where the range of conditions reflects realistic workplace situations. The competencies covered by this unit would be demonstrated by an individual working alone or as part of a team. The assessment environment should not disadvantage the candidate.
This unit could be assessed in conjunction with any other units addressing the safety, quality, communication, materials handling, recording and reporting associated with writing robot programming or other units requiring the exercise of the skills and knowledge covered by this unit.
Method of assessment
Assessors should gather a range of evidence that is valid, sufficient, current and authentic. Evidence can be gathered through a variety of ways including direct observation, supervisor's reports, project work, samples and questioning. Questioning should not require language, literacy and numeracy skills beyond those required in this unit. The candidate must have access to all tools, equipment, materials and documentation required. The candidate must be permitted to refer to any relevant workplace procedures, product and manufacturing specifications, codes, standards, manuals and reference materials.
Guidance information for assessment
Replaced By
State Code National Code Title Type
OAW20 MEM07039 Write programs for industrial robots Unit of competency
State Code National Code Title Type
W245 MEM40105 Certificate IV in Engineering Qualification
W247 MEM50105 Diploma of Engineering - Advanced Trade Qualification