Unit of competency Outline

Date retreived
21/07/2026 11:40 PM AWST

Whilst all efforts are made to provide accurate and timely information from the relevant source/documentation, please be aware that the information supplied may not be the most current version. The accuracy of the detail has not been confirmed by the Department and therefore should not be relied upon without first confirming the contents.

Arrange contracts

Arrange contracts

Unit of competency
National Code
LGACOM402A
State Code
C3821
TGA Status
Deleted
DTWD Status
Deleted
Current Release Number
2.00
Current Release Date
11/09/2012
State Implementation and Classification
Approved Date
30/05/2014
Field of Education
090901 - Business And Commercial Law
Original Release Date
30/05/2014
Nominal Hours
20
Description
This unit covers receiving and evaluating tenders, preparing recommendations and notifying tenderers of the outcome.
Notes
Elements and Performance Criteria
1. Receive tenders
  • 1.1. Tenders are received in accordance with council procedures.
  • 1.2. Record of applications is maintained.
2. Evaluate tenders against agreed criteria
  • 2.1. A comparative statement of tenders highlighting key factors is prepared.
  • 2.2. Bids are compared and assessed.
  • 2.3. The bid or shortlist of bids that meets service requirements is identified.
  • 2.4. Tender presentations are organised and attended to assist in the selection process, where required.
3. Prepare recommendations for council
  • 3.1. Quality accreditation, previous project records, employment practices and occupational health and safety (OHS) records are verified.
  • 3.2. An accurate report with clear recommendations is prepared for council to enable informed decision making to occur.
4. Formalise acceptance of tender
  • 4.1. A letter of acceptance is sent to successful tenderer outlining accurate details and conditions.
  • 4.2. Contract documentation is completed in accordance with standards and council procedures.
  • 4.3. Unsuccessful tenderers are informed of outcome according to council procedures.
  • 4.4. Quality of contract documentation is evaluated in the light of tenders received.
The Range Statement relates to the Unit of Competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording in the Performance Criteria is detailed below.
Comparative statement may include:
matrix
data
criteria
compliance
score
Council procedures may include:
code of conduct
probity guidelines
anti-corruption policies
equal employment opportunity
OHS
risk management
resource management/sustainable practice
environmental awareness
storage and disposal of documentation
security of tenders
Formalisation may include:
contract signing procedure
preliminary deposits
Service requirements may include:
life-cycle costing
financial stability
capacity
sustainability
employment and industrial relations history
quality assurance
OHS records.
Presentations may include:
meetings
site visits
project inspections
interviews
Overview of assessment requirements
A person who demonstrates competency in this unit will be able to perform the outcomes described in the Elements to the required performance level detailed in the Performance Criteria. The knowledge and skill requirements described in the Range Statement must also be demonstrated. For example, knowledge of the legislative framework and safe work practices that underpin the performance of the unit are also required to be demonstrated
Critical aspects of evidence to be considered
Provide an accurate evaluation report
Identify the financial stability of the tenderer
Identify the quality standards of the tenderer
Ensure confidentiality of the tender process
Adhere to sustainable practices
Observe relevant environmental procedures
Context of assessment
On the job or in a simulated work environment.
Method of assessment
The following assessment methods are suggested:
observation of the learner performing a range of workplace tasks over sufficient time to demonstrate handling of a range of contingencies
written and/or oral questioning to assess knowledge and understanding
completion of workplace documentation
third-party reports from experienced practitioners
completion of self-paced learning materials including personal reflection and feedback from trainer, coach or supervisor
Evidence required for demonstration of consistent performance
Evidence will need to be gathered over time across a range of variables.
Resource implications
Access to a workplace or simulated case study that enables competency to be assessed and that provides such resources as:
relevant council policy and procedure documentation
relevant Australian and industry standards
a range of tender examples
No information