Unit of competency Outline
Date retreived
22/07/2026 9:25 PM AWST
22/07/2026 9:25 PM AWST
Whilst all efforts are made to provide accurate and timely information from the relevant source/documentation, please be aware that the information supplied may not be the most current version. The accuracy of the detail has not been confirmed by the Department and therefore should not be relied upon without first confirming the contents.
Report on a quality audit
Report on a quality audit
Unit of competency
National Code
BSBAUD504B
BSBAUD504B
State Code
D0607
D0607
TGA Status
Replaced
Replaced
DTWD Status
Replaced
Replaced
State Implementation and Classification
Approved Date
07/07/2014
Field of Education
080317 - Quality Management
Original Release Date
07/07/2014
Nominal Hours
40
Description
This unit describes the performance outcomes, skills and knowledge required to report on the outcomes of a quality audit and to take appropriate follow up action. It covers compiling audit results; preparing a report for the auditee/client; negotiating follow up action with the auditee/client; and monitoring and reviewing auditing system and activities.The types of quality audit that may be covered by this unit include an external or internal systems audit or process or product/service audit.No licensing, legislative, regulatory or certification requirements apply to this unit at the time of endorsement.
Notes
Elements and Performance Criteria
1. Compile audit results
- 1.1. Compare results of audit evaluation against audit objectives and criteria
- 1.2. Analyse audit results
2. Prepare report
- 2.1. Provide objective evidence relating to the need for reduction, elimination and prevention of non-conformance as the basis for the audit report
- 2.2. Produce audit report according to specified audit requirements
- 2.3. Present audit report to auditee and other stakeholders
3. Negotiate follow up process with auditee
- 3.1. Determine and initiate any corrective action required to deal with non-conformance, in consultation with auditee
- 3.2. Provide suggestions for improvements where applicable
- 3.3. Ensure time lines are agreed upon for completion of corrective action activities
- 3.4. Ensure corrective action follow-up procedures are agreed with auditee
4. Monitor and review audit system and activities
- 4.1. Evaluate effectiveness and suitability in achieving audit objectives
- 4.2. Investigate possible improvements in audit methods, economy and efficiency
RANGE STATEMENT
The range statement relates to the unit of competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording, if used in the performance criteria, is detailed below. Essential operating conditions that may be present with training and assessment (depending on the work situation, needs of the candidate, accessibility of the item, and local industry and regional contexts) may also be included.
Results may include:
corrective actions to reduce, eliminate and prevent non-conformance
examination and evaluation of controls associated with systems, activities and processes
means of improving processes, systems, products and business results
objective evidence of conformance
objective evidence of non-conformance relating to organisational processes, systems, activities, products and/or services
Audit report may include:
agreed objectives and scope of audit
audit results
distribution list for the audit report
follow-up required
identification of audit team members
identification of the auditee's representatives
information on confidentiality
outline of the auditing process, including obstacles encountered
retention of auditing records, including work documents
specified audit requirements
timeframe in which audit was conducted
Improvements in audit methods may include:
assessment of audit results
evaluation of auditor performance
evaluation of the effect of the quality audit outcomes on the auditee's activities, products and/or services
examination of complaints, appeals and other feedback received from auditee
examination of mechanisms by which consistency of audits is achieved
overall evaluation of the methods and effectiveness of the audit organisation
review of the audit reporting process and records
The range statement relates to the unit of competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording, if used in the performance criteria, is detailed below. Essential operating conditions that may be present with training and assessment (depending on the work situation, needs of the candidate, accessibility of the item, and local industry and regional contexts) may also be included.
Results may include:
corrective actions to reduce, eliminate and prevent non-conformance
examination and evaluation of controls associated with systems, activities and processes
means of improving processes, systems, products and business results
objective evidence of conformance
objective evidence of non-conformance relating to organisational processes, systems, activities, products and/or services
Audit report may include:
agreed objectives and scope of audit
audit results
distribution list for the audit report
follow-up required
identification of audit team members
identification of the auditee's representatives
information on confidentiality
outline of the auditing process, including obstacles encountered
retention of auditing records, including work documents
specified audit requirements
timeframe in which audit was conducted
Improvements in audit methods may include:
assessment of audit results
evaluation of auditor performance
evaluation of the effect of the quality audit outcomes on the auditee's activities, products and/or services
examination of complaints, appeals and other feedback received from auditee
examination of mechanisms by which consistency of audits is achieved
overall evaluation of the methods and effectiveness of the audit organisation
review of the audit reporting process and records
EVIDENCE GUIDE
The Evidence Guide provides advice on assessment and must be read in conjunction with the performance criteria, required skills and knowledge, range statement and the Assessment Guidelines for the Training Package.
Overview of assessment
Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit
Evidence of the following is essential:
completion and presentation of audit reports to auditees/clients and stakeholders
negotiations for follow-up actions with auditees/clients
knowledge of auditing regulations and standards.
Context of and specific resources for assessment
Assessment must ensure:
access to workplace documentation including quality audit reports, checklists, risk management plans and audit plans.
Method of assessment
A range of assessment methods should be used to assess practical skills and knowledge. The following examples are appropriate for this unit:
analysis of objective evidence provided in relation to the need for reduction, elimination and prevention of non-conformance
review of audit reports
direct questioning combined with review of portfolios of evidence by third party workplace reports of on-the-job performance by the candidate
analysis of documentation outlining possible improvements in audit methods
observations of interactions with team members, colleagues and auditees
observations of presentations of audit reports to auditees and their organisation
oral or written questioning to assess knowledge of audit report contents
review of corrective action follow-up procedures agreed with auditee.
Guidance information for assessment
Holistic assessment with other units relevant to the industry sector, workplace and job role is recommended, for example:
other quality auditing units.
The Evidence Guide provides advice on assessment and must be read in conjunction with the performance criteria, required skills and knowledge, range statement and the Assessment Guidelines for the Training Package.
Overview of assessment
Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit
Evidence of the following is essential:
completion and presentation of audit reports to auditees/clients and stakeholders
negotiations for follow-up actions with auditees/clients
knowledge of auditing regulations and standards.
Context of and specific resources for assessment
Assessment must ensure:
access to workplace documentation including quality audit reports, checklists, risk management plans and audit plans.
Method of assessment
A range of assessment methods should be used to assess practical skills and knowledge. The following examples are appropriate for this unit:
analysis of objective evidence provided in relation to the need for reduction, elimination and prevention of non-conformance
review of audit reports
direct questioning combined with review of portfolios of evidence by third party workplace reports of on-the-job performance by the candidate
analysis of documentation outlining possible improvements in audit methods
observations of interactions with team members, colleagues and auditees
observations of presentations of audit reports to auditees and their organisation
oral or written questioning to assess knowledge of audit report contents
review of corrective action follow-up procedures agreed with auditee.
Guidance information for assessment
Holistic assessment with other units relevant to the industry sector, workplace and job role is recommended, for example:
other quality auditing units.
Replaces
| State Code | National Code | Title | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| C7089 | BSBAUD504A | Report on a quality audit | Unit of competency |
Replaced By
| State Code | National Code | Title | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUH46 | BSBAUD504 | Report on a quality audit | Unit of competency |
| State Code | National Code | Title | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| W713 | CPC50509 | Diploma of Fire Systems Design | Qualification |
| J322 | PSP52612 | Diploma of Government (Road Transport Compliance) | Qualification |
| D178 | BSB51607 | Diploma of Quality Auditing | Qualification |