Unit of competency Outline

Date retreived
24/07/2026 12:24 AM AWST

Whilst all efforts are made to provide accurate and timely information from the relevant source/documentation, please be aware that the information supplied may not be the most current version. The accuracy of the detail has not been confirmed by the Department and therefore should not be relied upon without first confirming the contents.

Monitor the system pilot

Monitor the system pilot

Unit of competency
National Code
ICAPRG518A
State Code
D8033
TGA Status
Replaced
DTWD Status
Replaced
Current Release Number
1.00
Current Release Date
18/07/2011
State Implementation and Classification
Approved Date
17/11/2011
Field of Education
020305 - Systems Analysis And Design
Original Release Date
17/11/2011
Nominal Hours
20
Description
This unit describes the performance outcomes, skills and knowledge required to evaluate the performance of the developed system among a subset of clients.
Notes
Elements and Performance Criteria
1. Monitor implementation of pilot system
  • 1.1 Review pilot and support documentation
  • 1.2 Identify pilot and system procedures
  • 1.3 Supervise system functionality and integrity tests
  • 1.4 Document findings
  • 1.5 Provide appropriate technical support as required
2. Evaluate pilot system
  • 2.1 Review pilot objectives and success criteria against pilot operation
  • 2.2 Review client and executive feedback on pilot against acceptance criteria
  • 2.3 Identify and prioritise areas of success and improvement
  • 2.4 Assess the impact of changes on the pilot
  • 2.5 Document review process and submit to appropriate person
The range statement relates to the unit of competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording, if used in the performance criteria, is detailed below. Essential operating conditions that may be present with training and assessment (depending on the work situation, needs of the candidate, accessibility of the item, and local industry and regional contexts) may also be included.

Pilot may relate to:
nature of system
organisational requirements.
System may include:
application service provider (ASP)
applications
databases
gateways
internet service provider (ISP)
operating system
servers.
Client may include:
external organisations
individuals
internal departments
internal employees.
Acceptance criteria may include:
accessibility
cost implications
logistical considerations
technical
timeframe.
Appropriate person may include:
authorised business representative
client
supervisor.
The evidence guide provides advice on assessment and must be read in conjunction with the performance criteria, required skills and knowledge, range statement and the Assessment Guidelines for the Training Package.

Overview of assessment

Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit
Evidence of the ability to:
observe and evaluate the pilot by:
monitoring performance
analysing performance issues from a systems and a client user perspective
documenting findings
evaluating against acceptance criteria.
Context of and specific resources for assessment
Assessment must ensure access to:
acceptance criteria
pilot plan
system to be piloted
appropriate learning and assessment support when required
modified equipment for people with special needs.
Method of assessment
A range of assessment methods should be used to assess practical skills and knowledge. The following examples are appropriate for this unit:
evaluation of piloting process
review of pilot documentation prepared by candidate
verbal or written questioning to assess candidate’s knowledge of:
piloting methodologies
system’s current functionality.
Guidance information for assessment
Holistic assessment with other units relevant to the industry sector, workplace and job role is recommended, where appropriate.
Assessment processes and techniques must be culturally appropriate, and suitable to the communication skill level, language, literacy and numeracy capacity of the candidate and the work being performed.
Indigenous people and other people from a non-English speaking background may need additional support.
In cases where practical assessment is used it should be combined with targeted questioning to assess required knowledge.
Replaces
State Code National Code Title Type
D0073 ICAB5074B Monitor the system pilot Unit of competency
Replaced By
State Code National Code Title Type
AUV96 ICTPRG518 Monitor the system pilot Unit of competency
State Code National Code Title Type
D567 ICA50111 Diploma of Information Technology Qualification
D574 ICA50811 Diploma of Systems Analysis and Design Qualification