Unit of competency Outline

Date retreived
23/07/2026 11:45 AM AWST

Whilst all efforts are made to provide accurate and timely information from the relevant source/documentation, please be aware that the information supplied may not be the most current version. The accuracy of the detail has not been confirmed by the Department and therefore should not be relied upon without first confirming the contents.

Coordinate case preparation and research

Coordinate case preparation and research

Unit of competency
National Code
BSBWRK503A
State Code
D1048
TGA Status
Deleted
DTWD Status
Deleted
Current Release Number
1.00
Current Release Date
10/03/2009
State Implementation and Classification
Approved Date
10/07/2014
Field of Education
080309 - Industrial Relations
Original Release Date
10/07/2014
Nominal Hours
50
Description
This unit describes the performance outcomes, skills and knowledge required to effectively coordinate and prepare cases on behalf of the union before a tribunal. It covers formulating strategies within a legal framework to achieve optimum outcomes; providing advice on cases; and undertaking research and preparing case submissions.No licensing, legislative, regulatory or certification requirements apply to this unit at the time of endorsement.
Notes
Elements and Performance Criteria
1. Work within a constitutional and legislative framework
  • 1.1. Identify relevant court, tribunal and administrative bodies to respond to each employment-related matter
  • 1.2. Apply knowledge of the constitutional or legislative framework to work
  • 1.3. Consider scope of jurisdiction and industrial matters
  • 1.4. Explain and apply practical application of key employment laws
2. Formulate strategy within the appropriate jurisdiction
  • 2.1. Apply knowledge of the appropriate jurisdiction
  • 2.2. Apply knowledge of employment laws to achieve best outcomes
  • 2.3. Ensure strategic decisions are informed by an understanding of the jurisdiction's powers
3. Advise on the validity and credibility of cases
  • 3.1. Gather relevant information with sufficient detail for an accurate evaluation to be made
  • 3.2. Consult specialists in instances where expert interpretation or advice is required
  • 3.3. Make judgements on the basis of clear and accurate information
  • 3.4. Evaluate likelihood of success using valid and reliable case information
  • 3.5. Inform interested parties of likely outcomes with a clear rationale given for anticipated results
  • 3.6. Develop a full range of options for resolution and explain rationale for option selection
  • 3.7. Advise interested parties of rationale and provide them with information about their options where the union will not support the case
  • 3.8. Store relevant information accurately and securely and disclose confidential information only with the express permission of the member and only to appropriate parties
4. Prepare case submissions
  • 4.1. Identify case objectives
  • 4.2. Identify and assess key strengths and weaknesses, including gap areas requiring further research
  • 4.3. Predict opposing arguments and address key points to be made
  • 4.4. Check case regularly for its validity and likely outcomes
  • 4.5. Prepare sufficient and appropriate rebuttal of opposing party's case or build into the submission
  • 4.6. Prepare appropriate submissions
  • 4.7. Ensure established procedures and time lines for submission of written material and responses are met
5. Undertake case research
  • 5.1. Identify relevant supporting and opposing precedents and arguments
  • 5.2. Prepare evidence materials
  • 5.3. Identify key studies, research and other material in support of the case or that support opposing arguments
  • 5.4. Re-evaluate the case against research outcomes
RANGE STATEMENT
The range statement relates to the unit of competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording, if used in the performance criteria, is detailed below. Essential operating conditions that may be present with training and assessment (depending on the work situation, needs of the candidate, accessibility of the item, and local industry and regional contexts) may also be included.
Strategic decisions may involve:
application for adjournments
applications for orders restraining an employer from undertaking certain activities
referral of matters into conciliation
use of dispute resolution processes
Specialists may include:
academics
economists or other recognised persons within their field
legal counsel
pre-eminent persons
Submissions may include:
written case outline
written submissions
witness statements
Evidence materials may include:
exhibits
inspection records
precedent decisions
witness statements
written or other records
Key studies, research and other material could include:
commissioned research
government statistical and other reports
journal materials
publications
research articles
research reports
EVIDENCE GUIDE
The Evidence Guide provides advice on assessment and must be read in conjunction with the performance criteria, required skills and knowledge, range statement and the Assessment Guidelines for the Training Package.

Overview of assessment

Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit
Evidence of the following is essential:
demonstrated experience in having coordinated case preparation and evidence relating to an actual employment-related case on behalf of the union
demonstrated ability to coordinate the preparation of a case involving a number of people, to undertake detailed analysis of research, to commission research to support the case, and to prepare overall case outlines and submissions on behalf of the union
knowledge of relevant employment agreements and awards, and terms and conditions of employment.
Context of and specific resources for assessment
Assessment must ensure:
access to a wide range of documentation relating to cases which the union may have run, or be required to run.
Method of assessment
A range of assessment methods should be used to assess practical skills and knowledge. The following examples are appropriate for this unit:
assessment of written reports/examples of documented cases
direct questioning combined with review of portfolios of evidence and third party workplace reports of on-the-job performance by the candidate
observation of presentations
oral or written questioning to assess knowledge of legislation covering industrial relations, OHS, environmental issues, or anti-discrimination
review of options developed for resolution and review of rationale for option selected
review of documentation predicting opposing arguments and addressing key points to be made
evaluation of evidence materials prepared.
Guidance information for assessment
Holistic assessment with other units relevant to the industry sector, workplace and job role is recommended, for example:
other workplace relations units.
Replaces
State Code National Code Title Type
C7101 BSBUN503A Coordinate case preparation and research Unit of competency
State Code National Code Title Type
D180 BSB51807 Diploma of Unionism and Industrial Relations Qualification