Unit of competency Outline
Date retreived
22/07/2026 11:36 PM AWST
22/07/2026 11:36 PM AWST
Whilst all efforts are made to provide accurate and timely information from the relevant source/documentation, please be aware that the information supplied may not be the most current version. The accuracy of the detail has not been confirmed by the Department and therefore should not be relied upon without first confirming the contents.
Trial new process or product
Trial new process or product
Unit of competency
National Code
MSAPMOPS401A
MSAPMOPS401A
State Code
W8270
W8270
TGA Status
Replaced
Replaced
DTWD Status
Replaced
Replaced
State Implementation and Classification
Approved Date
04/08/2014
Field of Education
030101 - Manufacturing Engineering
Original Release Date
04/08/2014
Nominal Hours
26
Description
This competency typically applies to a technician in a plant who is taking a lead technical role in the trialling of a new product or the trialling of a new or significantly altered process. This competency does not apply to minor modifications to existing products or processes. Similarly it does not apply to a technician or operator taking part in such trials, and/or who is following directions set by the technician, chemist, engineer, supervisor or manager.The technician is expected to be a technical expert in that part of the plant/process where the trial is being conducted.
Notes
Elements and Performance Criteria
1. Contribute to the selection of equipment/process conditions.
- 1.1 Liaise with appropriate technical expert(s).
- 1.2 Interpret properties of materials and desired product characteristics.
- 1.3 Interpret technical specifications/drawings of plant requirements.
- 1.4 Recommend equipment/ancillary equipment appropriate for the materials, products and conditions.
- 1.5 Recommend process conditions appropriate for the equipment, materials and product characteristics.
- 1.6 Recommend feed rates/order/condition appropriate to the process conditions, equipment, materials and product characteristics.
- 1.7 Ensure hazard identification and analysis procedures are completed, including consultation with stakeholders, and findings included in plan.
- 1.8 Ensure recommendations meet the identified need.
2. Prepare for trials.
- 2.1 Determine the availability of resources required such as materials, equipment, people and skills.
- 2.2 Estimate time required for trial.
- 2.3 Liaise with relevant stakeholders.
- 2.4 Schedule trial at a convenient time.
- 2.5 Develop documentation for the trial.
- 2.6 Identify potential hazards and required hazard control procedures by applying the hierarchy of control.
- 2.7 Determine clearance requirements and special safety and storage requirements.
- 2.8 Verify decisions with appropriate experts/stakeholders.
- 2.9 Ensure people with adequate skills are available for the trial.
3. Conduct test runs/trials
- 3.1 Ensure hazard controls are implemented prior to commencement.
- 3.2 Run trials.
- 3.3 Maintain communication with all relevant people.
- 3.4 Closely monitor critical parameters.
- 3.5 Recognise actual and potential problems.
- 3.6 Make adjustments to process conditions as required during trial.
- 3.7 Sample and test product as required.
- 3.8 Record and report performance data.
- 3.9 Ensure all materials, products and waste are handled correctly.
- 3.10 Leave plant in a condition suitable for routine production to recommence.
4. Evaluate results and identify modifications.
- 4.1 Interpret data from trial.
- 4.2 Identify factors which might be related to low rates or low charge amounts.
- 4.3 Recommend modifications and improvements required.
- 4.4 Develop and check standard operating procedure.
- 4.5 Complete documentation and report to appropriate personnel.
- 4.6 Ensure all relevant staff have required skill levels for the introduction of the new process.
RANGE STATEMENT
The Range Statement relates to the unit of competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Add any essential operating conditions that may be present with training and assessment depending on the work situation, needs of the candidate, accessibility of the item, and local industry and regional contexts.
Where reference is made to industry codes of practice, and/or Australian/international standards, the latest version must be used.
Context
This unit includes all items of equipment and unit operations which form part of the trial.
Liaison
Liaison with technical experts may (depending on trial requirements and company protocols) include one or more of:
manufacturers
chemists
engineering personnel
designers
OHS advisors
maintenance personnel
potential customers.
Hazard analysis
Hazard analysis procedures may include:
JSA/JHA (Job Safety Analysis/Job Hazard Analysis)
hazard and operability (HAZOP) studies
hazard analysis (HAZAN) studies
other company specified procedures.
It is not expected that the candidate will be able to conduct technical hazard analysis procedures (such as HAZOP or HAZAN) but they should be able to interpret and use the outcomes of such analyses where relevant.
Hazards
Hazards may be determined from:
materials safety data sheets (MSDSs)
other relevant documentation such as hazard logs, incident reports
company hazard identification procedures
hazard analysis results
standard operating procedures.
Waste handling
Waste handling may include:
collection for re-use
recycling
disposal in accordance with health and environmental regulations.
Problems
Typical problems for the trial might include:
mixing is poor
materials do not behave as expected
process/reaction does not proceed /proceeds too slowly
process/reaction proceeds too quickly/runs away
yield is low
quality is out of specification
process is unstable
instrumentation is not sufficiently sensitive/too sensitive
variable catalyst activity
surging flow/pressure.
Health, Safety and Environment (HSE)
All operations to which this unit applies are subject to stringent health, safety and environment requirements, which may be imposed through State or Federal legislation, and these must not be compromised at any time. Where there is an apparent conflict between performance criteria and HSE requirements, the HSE requirements take precedence.
Procedures
All operations are performed in accordance with procedures.
Procedures means all relevant workplace procedures, work instructions, temporary instructions and relevant industry and government codes and standards.
The Range Statement relates to the unit of competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Add any essential operating conditions that may be present with training and assessment depending on the work situation, needs of the candidate, accessibility of the item, and local industry and regional contexts.
Where reference is made to industry codes of practice, and/or Australian/international standards, the latest version must be used.
Context
This unit includes all items of equipment and unit operations which form part of the trial.
Liaison
Liaison with technical experts may (depending on trial requirements and company protocols) include one or more of:
manufacturers
chemists
engineering personnel
designers
OHS advisors
maintenance personnel
potential customers.
Hazard analysis
Hazard analysis procedures may include:
JSA/JHA (Job Safety Analysis/Job Hazard Analysis)
hazard and operability (HAZOP) studies
hazard analysis (HAZAN) studies
other company specified procedures.
It is not expected that the candidate will be able to conduct technical hazard analysis procedures (such as HAZOP or HAZAN) but they should be able to interpret and use the outcomes of such analyses where relevant.
Hazards
Hazards may be determined from:
materials safety data sheets (MSDSs)
other relevant documentation such as hazard logs, incident reports
company hazard identification procedures
hazard analysis results
standard operating procedures.
Waste handling
Waste handling may include:
collection for re-use
recycling
disposal in accordance with health and environmental regulations.
Problems
Typical problems for the trial might include:
mixing is poor
materials do not behave as expected
process/reaction does not proceed /proceeds too slowly
process/reaction proceeds too quickly/runs away
yield is low
quality is out of specification
process is unstable
instrumentation is not sufficiently sensitive/too sensitive
variable catalyst activity
surging flow/pressure.
Health, Safety and Environment (HSE)
All operations to which this unit applies are subject to stringent health, safety and environment requirements, which may be imposed through State or Federal legislation, and these must not be compromised at any time. Where there is an apparent conflict between performance criteria and HSE requirements, the HSE requirements take precedence.
Procedures
All operations are performed in accordance with procedures.
Procedures means all relevant workplace procedures, work instructions, temporary instructions and relevant industry and government codes and standards.
The Evidence Guide provides advice on assessment and must be read in conjunction with the Performance Criteria, Required Skills and Knowledge, the Range Statement and the Assessment Guidelines for this Training Package.
Overview of assessment
Assessors must be satisfied that the person can consistently perform the unit as a whole, as defined by the Elements, Performance Criteria and skills and knowledge.
The unit will be assessed in as holistic a manner as is practical and may be integrated with the assessment of other relevant units of competency.
Assessment will occur over a range of situations which will include disruptions to normal, smooth operation.
Critical aspects
It is essential that competence is demonstrated in the ability to recognise and analyse potential situations requiring action and then in implementing appropriate corrective action. The emphasis should be on the ability to stay out of trouble rather than on recovery from a disaster.
Consistent performance should be demonstrated. For example, look to see that:
hazards are identified and controlled
early warning signs of equipment/processes needing attention or with potential problems are recognised
the range of possible causes can be identified and analysed and the most likely cause determined
appropriate and timely action is taken to ensure the safety and success of the trial
obvious problems in related plant areas are recognised and an appropriate contribution made to their solution.
Context and method of assessment
This unit of competency requires a significant body of knowledge which will be assessed through questioning and the use of 'what if' scenarios both on the plant (during demonstration of normal operations and walk throughs of abnormal operations) and off the plant.
Competence in this unit may be assessed:
using a pilot plant or a production plant as appropriate
using a range of scenarios/case studies and 'what ifs' as the stimulus with a walk-through forming part of the response
using a range of problems, including new, unusual and improbable situations which may have been generated from the past incident history of the plant, incidents on similar plants around the world, hazard analysis activities and similar sources
using a suitable simulation and/or a range of case studies/scenarios
through a combination of these techniques.
In all cases it is expected that practical assessment will be combined with targeted questioning to assess the underpinning knowledge; and theoretical assessment will be combined with appropriate practical/simulation or similar assessment. Assessors need to be aware of any cultural issues that may affect responses to questions.
Assessment processes and techniques must be culturally appropriate and appropriate to the oracy, language and literacy capacity of the assessee and the work being performed.
Specific resources for assessment
This section should be read in conjunction with the Range Statement for this unit of competency. Resources required include suitable access to an operating plant or equipment that allows for appropriate and realistic simulation. A bank of case studies/scenarios and questions will also be required to the extent that they form part of the assessment method. Questioning may take place either in the workplace, or in an adjacent, quiet facility such as an office or lunchroom. No other special resources are required.
Access must be provided to appropriate learning and/or assessment support when required. Where applicable, physical resources should include equipment modified for people with disabilities.
Overview of assessment
Assessors must be satisfied that the person can consistently perform the unit as a whole, as defined by the Elements, Performance Criteria and skills and knowledge.
The unit will be assessed in as holistic a manner as is practical and may be integrated with the assessment of other relevant units of competency.
Assessment will occur over a range of situations which will include disruptions to normal, smooth operation.
Critical aspects
It is essential that competence is demonstrated in the ability to recognise and analyse potential situations requiring action and then in implementing appropriate corrective action. The emphasis should be on the ability to stay out of trouble rather than on recovery from a disaster.
Consistent performance should be demonstrated. For example, look to see that:
hazards are identified and controlled
early warning signs of equipment/processes needing attention or with potential problems are recognised
the range of possible causes can be identified and analysed and the most likely cause determined
appropriate and timely action is taken to ensure the safety and success of the trial
obvious problems in related plant areas are recognised and an appropriate contribution made to their solution.
Context and method of assessment
This unit of competency requires a significant body of knowledge which will be assessed through questioning and the use of 'what if' scenarios both on the plant (during demonstration of normal operations and walk throughs of abnormal operations) and off the plant.
Competence in this unit may be assessed:
using a pilot plant or a production plant as appropriate
using a range of scenarios/case studies and 'what ifs' as the stimulus with a walk-through forming part of the response
using a range of problems, including new, unusual and improbable situations which may have been generated from the past incident history of the plant, incidents on similar plants around the world, hazard analysis activities and similar sources
using a suitable simulation and/or a range of case studies/scenarios
through a combination of these techniques.
In all cases it is expected that practical assessment will be combined with targeted questioning to assess the underpinning knowledge; and theoretical assessment will be combined with appropriate practical/simulation or similar assessment. Assessors need to be aware of any cultural issues that may affect responses to questions.
Assessment processes and techniques must be culturally appropriate and appropriate to the oracy, language and literacy capacity of the assessee and the work being performed.
Specific resources for assessment
This section should be read in conjunction with the Range Statement for this unit of competency. Resources required include suitable access to an operating plant or equipment that allows for appropriate and realistic simulation. A bank of case studies/scenarios and questions will also be required to the extent that they form part of the assessment method. Questioning may take place either in the workplace, or in an adjacent, quiet facility such as an office or lunchroom. No other special resources are required.
Access must be provided to appropriate learning and/or assessment support when required. Where applicable, physical resources should include equipment modified for people with disabilities.
Replaced By
| State Code | National Code | Title | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| AXO28 | MSMOPS401 | Trial new process or product | Unit of competency |